Tranny Tyranny
By Gina Miller
RenewAmerica.com
We have seen in the past several
years under the Barack Obama (or whatever his name
is) administration a militant homosexual movement on
steroids, running at warp speed. Many of us have
been warning you that this movement is not what it
seems, what it's being sold as to the American
public. While its proponents claim it is simply
about gaining "marriage equality" and "civil rights"
for homosexual, "transgender" and other sexual
deviants, that is not the case.
At its core, this movement is about tyranny. It's
about subverting the rights of people who hold
traditional moral values, which are antithetical to
immoral, centralized government control. It's about
silencing the dissent of those who oppose the
destruction of marriage and the mainstreaming of
deviancy. It's about deconstructing the foundations
and truths of our freedom-based, constitutional
Republic. This movement's goals are in line with the
goals of the communists, and I'm certain that many
homosexual activists, who are only useful pawns of
this movement, do not see this.
The latest front to aggressively emerge in the
radical homosexual movement's war against God,
truth, reason and freedom is in the area of
expanded, special rights for people suffering from
"transgenderism," which is a mental (and spiritual)
disorder. Those who labor under it believe they are
members of the opposite sex, which is a biological
impossibility, thus it has always, until recently,
been rightly observed to be a disease of the mind.
In our twisted age of "political correctness," some
heavily politicized "scientific" and medical
"professionals" have abandoned truth and reason and
lent their credibility to the lie that it's somehow
possible for a man to be a woman. This is pitiful,
mob insanity.
The push for special rights for "transgenders" is
finally shaking awake many people who have ignored
the steady progress of the radical homosexual
movement. When it comes to the prospect of federal
"employment non-discrimination law" favoring sexual
deviants being shoved down our throats, and the
reality of what it would mean for business owners
and others, people are starting to understand the
despotism such an edict would be. It would mean, for
instance, that a businessman could very easily be
successfully sued by a mentally disordered man who
insists on dressing like a woman, if that
businessman turned him down for a job. There are
myriad bad scenarios you can imagine that would
result from such a federal law.
On Monday, I read an outstanding column on this
subject by
Stella Morabito, who, according to her
biographical entry, is a journalist, former
intelligence analyst and an expert in various
aspects of Russian and Soviet politics, including
communist media and propaganda. Her piece, titled, "How
The Trans-Agenda Seeks To Redefine Everyone," is
truly a must-read for anyone seeking to understand
the true goals of this diabolical movement. She
writes:
Did you think only women get pregnant? Or only
women get abortions? Planned Parenthood and NARAL –
ironically both pro-abortion organizations that
self-identify as champions of women's rights – may
soon be trying to change your mind about that.
One signal comes from a little petition drive that
goes by
#protransprochoice. It urges both Planned
Parenthood and NARAL to adopt language more
"inclusive" of transgender persons and to
acknowledge "gender-non-conforming" people. Both
pro-abortion organizations, which have been longtime
supporters of the LGBT lobby, tweeted back
supportive replies.
So what does this mean and why should we care?
Ms. Morabito goes on to present the account of the
"pregnant man" featured on Oprah Winfrey's show and
throughout the major media a few years back. This
"man" was, of course, a woman, calling herself
"Thomas," who had her body surgically mutilated and
hormones administered to give her a manly
appearance, yet she retained her female reproductive
organs and used them (along with donor sperm) to get
pregnant and give birth to a few babies (poor
babies!). Ms. Morabito then notes:
So what does it all mean? At root, this isn't
really about people like Thomas. It's mostly about
everybody else. It's all about changing you and your
self-concept. As fringy as they may sound, injecting
such lies into our language – "the pregnant man" and
the push to separate the word "pregnancy" from the
word "woman" – are clear signals that we are moving
steadily towards erasing all gender distinctions in
the law.
And why should we care? Because erasing gender
distinctions, especially as they apply to
childbearing and rearing, would serve to legally
un-define what it means to be human. A new legal
definition of human – as neither male nor female –
would apply to you whether you like it or not.
Already, there is social pressure for everyone to
comply with the gender theory notion that biological
facts are mere "social constructs."
Ms. Morabito mentions the Employment
Non-Discrimination Act pending before Congress and
its sinister implications for reconstructing the
definition of humanity. She then writes:
The transgender movement has strong totalitarian
overtones that Americans (especially certain
senators) don't fully understand. How else to
describe a crusade with such far-reaching
consequences for First Amendment rights? The legal
destruction of gender distinctions will inevitably
dissolve family autonomy, thereby uprooting
freedom of association. Free expression becomes
"hate speech" if one doesn't fall into line with the
directives of the transgender lobby or its
pronoun protocol. Freedom of religion takes a direct
hit any way you look at it.
Under the guise of "rights," the transgender
movement can serve as convenient cover for
consolidating and centralizing power under an
ever-expanding State. Once we allow the State to
refuse to recognize that children result from the
male-female union, we grant the State more power to
separate us from our children. As power becomes more
centralized in the State, the individuals and
institutions of the State, inevitably flawed, end up
owning our personal relationships. With weakened
mediating institutions – family, churches, private
associations – we lose the buffer zones that stand
between individuals and an encroaching state.
... Let's think this through a bit more. If gender
distinctions are erased in law, all marriage will
become legally obsolete. The elites pushing same-sex
"marriage" have known this all along. If you thought
it was really marriage equality they were after, see
point three in
this Federalist article, "Bait and Switch."
If we agree to change language to suit the
transgender lobby, we ultimately agree to destroy in
law the entire basis (sex distinctions) for the only
union that can result in autonomously formed
families. The implications for privacy and personal
relationships are vast, and we need to understand
that.
If you think you'll be able to cultivate and
preserve strong personal relationships in this new
matrix, you are mistaken. That can't easily happen
in a system in which your familial relationships are
not acknowledged or respected by the State. This
gender-neutral scheme obliterates the template for
the family as a unit. And if the family is no longer
accepted as a union that originates through the
union of male and female, there is no real basis for
the State to recognize any family as an autonomous
unit. Without any such obligation, children become
more easily classified as state property and our
personal relationships are more easily controlled by
the state. If that sounds totalitarian, that's
because it is.
Stella Morabito's entire column is well worth
reading. She deeply considers the real implications
of this tyrannical "transgender" movement subset of
the larger militant homosexual movement, which is
not what it is deceptively packaged as being.
The truth is that as more outrages occur at the
hands of homosexual activists, rogue federal judges,
deluded politicians and a lawless "president," more
and more people will come to realize this movement
is a grave threat to our God-given,
constitutionally-protected freedoms and the very
foundational unit of a free, civil society – the
family.
© Gina Miller