The tall talker and the old geezers
By Wes Pruden
PrudenPolitics.com
Talking is the national sport in Washington. For the
old geezers in Congress it’s more fun than watching
baseball, complaining about the weather or
remembering sex.
Nobody drones on like a United States senator and
nobody loves the sound of his raspy voice like a
senator. Rand Paul, the freshman from Kentucky who
stars in the bad dreams of every Republican geezer
in town, talked for almost 13 hours on the Senate
floor this week to delay a confirmation vote on John
Brennan as director of the CIA, and earned only the
scorn of the geezers.
Mr.
Paul’s remarks occasionally strayed a few degrees
over the top (enough of the Hitler comparison),
decrying the prospect of using drones against
American citizens in America, but he strayed no
farther over the top than almost any congressman on
almost any day on Capitol Hill. Mr. Paul argued at
length (though not at record length) that killing an
American, even an evil terrorist with an American
passport, deprives him of the due process guaranteed
by the Constitution.
Challenging Barack Obama on anything will earn
anybody the sneers and scorn of Democratic senators,
but some of the Republican geezers joined the din of
disdain, mostly about the temerity of a freshman
senator talking when he should be listening to a
housebroken geezer talk. It’s not the sharks who
trouble the waters in Washington, but the minnows
who nibble good men to death.
John
McCain of Arizona rebuked the filibusterer just as
he was sitting down, and just after Mr. McCain and a
few of his Senate pals emerged from a cozy dinner
with President Obama in the glow of fine wine and
the warmth of a full belly of beef. Mr. McCain had a
little patronizing advice for his talkative
colleague: “Calm down, senator, the U.S. government
cannot randomly target U.S. citizens.”
The
presidential loser of '08 sent further advice on how
to win friends and influence voters. “If Mr. Paul
wants to be taken seriously he needs to do more than
pull political stunts that fire up impressionable
libertarian kids. I don’t think what happened is
helpful to the American people.”
Nobody expected Mr. Paul’s filibuster to stop the
confirmation of John Brennan, the senator least of
all, but he set out to sound an “alarm” about the
use of drones in what he calls the threat to
Americans by their own government. He had written to
the White House to inquire whether the government
could order a drone strike against an American on
American soil, and Attorney Gen. Eric Holder replied
with reassurance that does not necessarily reassure.
He said drones are limited to killing in conflict
zones in Pakistan and Yemen, and the government has
“no intention” to bomb any place specific.
So
far the argument is about drones and the word
“random.” How vague can the word “random” be? The
U.S. government can, and already has, targeted
American citizens without due process. The
government had no drones at Ruby Ridge, where
government agents targeted and killed a teenage
American boy, and had no drones at Waco, where
government agents set fire to a religious compound
and 76 men, women and children burned alive,
Americans all. The government’s record is not a good
one. The government’s “intentions” can change, and
“random” is a word even a jackleg lawyer could parse
far into the next decade. It’s just not cricket to
say so, and a geezer never would.
The
confirmation hearings of John Brennan and Chuck
Hagel reveal a lot about how Washington works, how
weak and well-meaning geezers can conflate the good
of the country with the good of their own biases.
John McCain and Lindsay Graham took Chuck Hagel
apart at his confirmation hearing, leaving him
humiliated as few nominees have been humiliated. But
when crunch time came, they fell into line, voting
to confirm him despite all the flags they raised at
his hearing, as if to say, “just kidding, guys.”
John
Brennan escaped close scrutiny over his role in the
fiasco at Benghazi, where four Americans, including
an American ambassador, died because the Obama White
House could not or would not send the help the
ambassador begged for -- not even a drone.
President Obama and John Brennan
The
geezers know better, but it’s easier, quieter, and
more refined to do nothing. When Rand Paul, over the
top or not, stood up to demand answers to some of
the questions the geezers themselves raised, he was
ridiculed and told, like an irritable child, to calm
down. Geezers think their role is to pour oil over
troubled waters, when they should be striking a
match.
Wesley Pruden is editor emeritus of The Washington
Times.