The Stolen Election of 2012
By Paul R.
Hollrah
DrRichSwier.com
The April 2, 2014 edition of
National Review Online
contains a blockbuster story detailing the results
of a widespread vote fraud investigation conducted
by the North Carolina State Board of Elections. In
their review of the 2012 General Election, the board
searched some 101,000,000 voter records in databases
of 27 other states, using the same names, dates of
birth, and Social Security numbers of individuals
who voted in the North Carolina General Election.
What they found provides convincing proof that
Democrats were not going to take any chances in
2012; they were not going to allow Mitt Romney to
ruin Barack Obama’s chances for a second term. What
the study of the 2012 election shows is that 35,570
North Carolina voters shared the same first names,
last names, and dates of birth with individuals
registered to vote in other states. Another 765
North Carolina voters had the same first names, last
names, birthdays, and final four digits of a Social
Security number as those who voted in other states,
stretching credulity to its absolute limits. Barack
Obama carried North Carolina in 2012 by a margin of
just 14,177 votes (0.33%). To what extent were those
voters residents of North Carolina who also voted in
27 other states, or were many of them residents of
27 other states who also voted in North Carolina?
In another recent study by the State of Virginia,
it was found that some 44,000 Virginia voters are
also registered to vote in Maryland. Of course,
fraudulent voting by Democrats is not unique to
North Carolina, Virginia, and Maryland. For
Democrats, vote fraud is a way of life… standard
operating procedure. And if the Republican Party had
any leaders fit to be called leaders, they would see
to it that the voting statistics of every state in
the nation are evaluated in exactly the same way as
the North Carolina voting age population.
For starters, the North Carolina attorney general
should hold a press conference, extending an
invitation to the 765 North Carolinians with the
same first names, last names, birth dates, and
Social Security numbers as individuals who were
found to have voted in other states to come forward
and identify themselves. Those individuals should be
allowed to plead guilty to felony vote fraud, pay a
hefty fine, and lose their voting rights for a
period as prescribed by law.
Of course, not all those who engage in vote fraud
could be expected to self-identify themselves. In
such cases, the North Carolina attorney general
should conduct forensic examinations of absentee
ballots held in North Carolina and other states,
lifting latent fingerprints from absentee ballots
and subjecting signatures to expert handwriting
analysis. Those who fail to self-identify, but whose
latent fingerprints are later found on absentee
ballots should be indicted, tried, subject to a
heavy fine, and sentenced to prison. Upon being
sentenced for felony vote fraud they should also
lose voting rights as prescribed by law.
Federal law requires that all state election
boards retain absentee ballots for at least
twenty-two months following an election. Many states
require ballots to be retained for twenty-four
months, or longer. So it is essential that
investigators conduct studies of double voting
within two years following an election or much of
the evidence of vote fraud will be destroyed.
In a recent speech before Al Sharpton’s National
Action Network, Barack Obama attempted to rally his
base by charging that Republicans are attempting to
suppress the black vote in the coming 2014 General
Election. Demonstrating once again that he is the
dimmest bulb on the porch, he said, “The principle
of one person-one vote is the single greatest tool
we have to redress an unjust status quo. You
would think there would not be an argument about
this anymore. But the stark, simple truth is
this: The right to vote is threatened today in
a way that it has not been since the Voting Rights
Act became law nearly five decades ago.”
Of course, as is the case with almost everything
Obama says, he was not speaking the truth; he was
only saying what he thought would appeal to his
low-information base. The fact is, except for
Democrat-sponsored fraud, the right to vote has not
been threatened at all in recent decades, compared
to the years between the Civil War and the
mid-1950s. In those years Democrats used the KKK to
intimidate and/or murder thousands of blacks for no
other reason than that they insisted on the right to
vote. Yes, the one person-one vote principle is a
critical concept in our system, but that means one
person-one vote, not one Republican-one vote and one
Democrat-two votes or three votes, as most Democrats
see as their birthright.
He went on to say, “Across the country,
Republicans have led efforts to pass laws making it
harder, not easier, for people to vote…” So if that
is a true statement, it must also be correct to say
that Republicans have led efforts to make it
impossible to board an airplane, to cash a check, to
make purchases with credit cards, to enter public
buildings, to sign up for food stamps, to sign up
for unemployment benefits, and to purchase beer,
wine, liquor, and cigarettes. But we all know that’s
not the case, so once again Obama is caught telling
untruths to people who are either too dumb or too
gullible to know that they’re being propagandized by
a four-Pinocchio liar.
The truth is, since the vast majority of those
behind prison bars are registered Democrats… those
who’ve either attempted to disrupt the social order
or who’ve attempted to enrich themselves at the
expense of others… it is only fair to say that it is
Democrats who are directly responsible for most of
these impositions on our time and integrity.
He said, “Now, I want to be clear! I am not
against reasonable attempts to secure the ballot.
We understand that there has (sic) to be rules in
place. But I am against requiring an ID that
millions of Americans don’t have. That
shouldn’t suddenly prevent you from exercising your
right to vote. So, yes, we’re right to be on
guard against voter fraud. Voter fraud would
impinge on our democracy, as well. We don’t
want folks voting that shouldn’t be voting. We
all agree on that. Let’s stipulate to that, as the
lawyers say.”
Unfortunately, with an attorney general like Eric
Holder, Obama can stipulate all he wants to. It
means about as much as a doctor stipulating that a
patient suffers from a terminal, but curable,
disease, but then prescribes no course of treatment.
Eric Holder has been handed irrefutable evidence of
vote fraud crimes by Democrats, all of which have
been filed in the “round file.”
Then, suggesting to his gullible listeners that
vote fraud is not a problem, he offered a few
statistics. He said, “One recent study found only 10
cases of alleged voter impersonation in 12 years… 10
cases. Another analysis found that, out of 197
million votes cast for federal elections between
2002 and 2005, only 40 voters… out of 197 million…
were indicted for fraud…”
Since a great many Democratic precincts regularly
produce far more than ten cases of in-person voter
impersonations, the people who put words on Obama’s
teleprompter must have searched long and hard to
find a source that would attest to only 10 cases in
the entire United States in a 12 year period. Since
Obama failed to cite the source for his statistics,
one might suspect that they came either from Eric
Holder or from the PR office at the Democrat
National Committee.
It apparently escaped Obama’s attention that, in
2012, in precincts all across the country, in major
cities with heavy Democratic majorities and powerful
Democratic machines, Mitt Romney was completely
“skunked,” receiving not a single vote out of
hundreds of thousands of votes cast. This, of
course, is not only a statistical improbability, it
is a statistical impossibility, but it went
completely unchallenged by Romney and the Republican
National Committee.
Giving a tip-of-the-hat to a former racist
Democrat president, Obama told his nearly all-black
audience that, at the time Lyndon Johnson signed the
Civil Rights Act, some of his advisors were
recommending caution, saying, “Well, all right, just
wait. You’ve done a big thing now; let’s let
the dust settle, don’t stir folks up.” But Obama
quotes Johnson as replying, “No, no, I can’t wait.
We’ve got to press forward and pass the Voting
Rights Act. About this there can and should be
no argument. Every American citizen must have
an equal right to vote.”
Of course, that represents only Obama’s sanitized
version of what Johnson may have said at the time.
According to two Democratic governors who flew with
him on Air Force One, what LBJ actually said was,
“I’ll have those n_ _ _ ers voting Democratic for
the next 200 years.”
The point is, African-Americans are rarely told
the truth about where white Democrats actually stand
on the issue of race. If the Republican Party had
leaders worthy of the title, they would begin to
tell them the truth, treating them as if they are
grownups.
To the best of my
knowledge, only one fraudulent voter in the entire
state of Ohio went to jail for vote fraud in 2013.
According to a story in the Cincinnati Enquirer,
Melowese Richardson was convicted of voting 5 times
for Barack Obama in 2012. She was released on March
11, 2014, after serving only eight months of a five
year sentence on the grounds that she is mentally
ill… a condition not uncommon among Obama voters.
It’s long past time that
Republicans moved forward with a national voter
registration database, tying every registered voter
to a name, address, birth date, and Social Security
number. It’s also long past time that we began
making a lot more Melowese Richardsons, whether
Democrats or Republicans. And if we don’t have
Republican leaders with the stomach for the task,
then it’s time to get new Republican leadership. We
don’t have to jail all Democrats who commit fraud…
we could never build enough jail cells… we only have
to jail enough of them to make the rest wonder if
perhaps they’ll be the next to hear a knock on their
door.