The Incredible Entitlement of the Welfare Lobby
By Daniel Greenfield
SultanKnish.Blogspot.com
Progressive America has a fever and the only
solution is more welfare. Celebrities are trying to
buy only $29 worth of fair trade arugula at Whole
Foods and then taking snapshots of it in a mistaken
effort to show how little food stamps buy. Obama is
urging more social welfare spending as the answer to
the race riots he stirred up across the country by
embracing the Ferguson “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot” hoax.
Outraged
rich liberals are furiously lecturing the rest of
the country on income inequality as if there were no
escaping the fact that we’re a society of greedy
plutocrats that doesn’t care about the poor.
Obama called for “massive investments in urban
communities”. Last year, we spent $75 billion on
food stamps. The year before that it was $80
billion. That’s up from $33 billion in 2007. The
number of participants has doubled approaching 50
million.
Is spending $80 billion on food stamps alone for a
sixth of the country not a massive investment?
Food stamp use in Baltimore under Obama increased
58%, but even back in 2009, a quarter of Baltimore
and a third of its black population were on food
stamps. Baltimore already accounts for almost half
of the food stamp using households in the entire
state.
Democratic Congressman Elijah Cummings called for an
“inclusion revolution” after the riots, but the
revolution in his district happened a while back
where a fifth of the households are on food stamps.
Even though the household racial split in the
seventh is about even, 85% of food stamp households
are black. Cummings says that Baltimore needs to be
a model for the nation. It’s a hell of a model.
The nation can’t survive turning into Baltimore. The
city is subsidized by Maryland taxpayers, a state
full of bedroom communities for consultants and
employees of the Federal government. Maryland didn’t
become the richest state in America through
entrepreneurship and hard work, but by siphoning off
massive Federal spending. Billions have already been
“massively invested” in Baltimore with no return.
Poor urban areas have not been “abandoned” by a cold
selfish nation that spends all its time watching FOX
News, as Obama claims, they have been subsidized up
to their ears. Every poverty statistic is presented
as if it were evidence of our guilt, when it’s
actually evidence of our incredible generosity.
The angriest portion of the population lives in
subsidized homes, goes to subsidized schools, shops
with food stamps and even works at subsidized
government jobs servicing the needs of the
aforementioned. MSNBC talking heads claimed that the
rioters and looters targeted the grocery and check
cashing places that were oppressing the community.
The only community they were oppressing was that of
taxpayers.
Those were the places where urban dependents turned
taxpayer subsidies into food and cash. They took
their cut of a transaction that deprived millions of
working families of their income and turned it over
to looters.
And when the looters found the opportunity, they
looted them.
Rioters don’t gleefully loot stores of snacks and
liquor while posing for selfies because they’re
outraged and oppressed, but because their sense of
entitlement has turned them into amateur sociopaths.
None of this is about oppression or poverty. It’s
about an incredible sense of entitlement.
We’ve blown past the antiquated mores in which
living on charity was shameful. What’s shameful now
is not spending enough money to subsidize the
inflated entitlement of the perpetually outraged.
We are cruel for only dumping $80 billion into food
stamps instead of $160 billion or $1.6 trillion or
whatever insane figure is meant to be the real
objective. Means tested welfare spending under Obama
has been in the trillions. Why not the quadrillions
or the quintillions? There’s no actual spending
limit.
This entire twisted debate about the sad plight of
the inner city is an indictment of us for not
spending enough money funding every possible gimmick
for the rioters and looters while believing that
some crimes, such as dealing drugs or beating random
people to death, should be punished by time in
prison.
All the proposed progressive policy solutions have
one thing in common; less responsibility. From
wrecking the criminal justice system to pouring even
more money into the giant urban pit, they ask
America to take more risks and responsibility while
expecting even less from Baltimore’s residents.
The single factor in Baltimore’s poverty
statistics that mattered the most wasn’t race; it
was family. Families headed by a married couple were
better off than blacks or whites individually.
There are other names for that phenomenon.
Responsibility. Commitment. Work ethic.
Baltimore’s problem isn’t segregation, lead paint or
any of the other liberal hobgoblins. It’s a lack of
responsibility. Responsible people get married.
Responsible people find work or create work.
Jobs aren’t created by government programs. They’re
created by people.
If a community doesn’t have jobs, that’s not the
fault of the capitalist pigs living on their yachts
while lighting their cigars with trillion dollars
bills. It’s a reflection on the people who live
there.
Tellingly the justifications for the looting
involved claims that the businesses don’t come from
the ‘community’. The question is why is the average
business in a depressed urban area run by immigrants
who just got off the plane with few other resources
than a large family and a willingness to work their
way into the ground? And it’s one of those questions
that answer themselves.
It’s not racism. It’s not because life on a
particular street is utterly hopeless. If it were,
the Chinese or Indians couldn’t make a go of it
there.
If an immigrant with eight kids and fewer language
skills than even one of the graduates of Baltimore’s
overfunded and thoroughly broken schools can swing
the financing to open a store that provides vital
malt liquor, lottery and potato chip services to the
neighborhood, why can’t the looters pawing through
the debris of his store figure out the same trick?
They can. They choose not to.
Hanging out with your friends and committing petty
crimes that escalate until they lead to that dreaded
“prison pipeline” is a lot more fun than working
fourteen hours a day so your kids can go to college.
Especially if the rest of the country can be induced
to subsidize your lifestyle using violence and
guilt.
It’s easier to loot a convenience store or a check
cashing place than it is to open one. It’s easier to
go back to another round of looting American
taxpayers than it is to get a job.
National poverty and crime rates mysteriously
declined after welfare reform in 1996. Unemployment
rates fell dramatically. So did murder rates.
But the welfare lobby won’t be satisfied until it
rolls back the clock to the welfare, poverty and
crime rates of the seventies. Now that the race
riots are here, we can look forward to experiencing
the entire glorious failed experiment in human
misery all over again. It’s as if the Russians had
decided to bring back collective agriculture because
they were tired of having so much food in their
stores.
Baltimore’s problem isn’t poverty. It’s entitlement.
And entitlement is just another word for
irresponsibility. The inner city doesn’t have a
poverty problem. It has an irresponsibility problem.
This isn’t a problem that more “massive investment”
can fix. It can only make it worse.
The
only answer to a sense of entitlement is
perspective. Our values offer us perspective. They
teach us responsibility by telling us that the
things that really matter are the ones that we work
hard for.
The left took away those values and the sense of
responsibility. They divided America into oppressors
and victims. They stirred up hate mobs to burn and
loot over the outrage of the moment, radicalizing
irresponsibility and feeding entitlement. But the
victims aren’t the ones who live off other people.
They’re the oppressors.
Victims work for a living. Oppressors live off them.
The victims take responsibility for their lives.
Oppressors only show entitlement.
The incredible entitlement of the welfare lobby has
to end if the inner city is to have a future.