No Business Like Government Business
By Daniel Greenfield
SultanKnish.Blogspot.com
Imagine a big corporation. A really big
corporation that monopolizes everything and compels
you to buy its low quality overpriced services and
imprisons you if you refuse to pay whether you use
them or not.
Now imagine a CEO who picks and chooses which
laws to follow, who breaks the law, embezzles huge
sums for his friends, lies repeatedly and is
never.held accountable for it.
We are all shareholders of the corporation of
government whose board and CEO we vote for, but
whose undemocratic governing mechanisms make those
votes less meaningful and many of whose shareholders
are part of bloc votes that profit from the
unsustainable practices of the corporation and vote
in bad boards that rob us blind so that they can
pocket more money.
The corporation's goal is to turn its shareholders
into consumers; transforming free people into people
who want free things so that the corporation of
government can govern the people without being
governed by them.
Once, Americans were shareholders of government.
Today Americans are consumers of government. They
aren't calling the shots; they're standing in line
hoping for a special on health care in Aisle 1500.
The current incarnation of the American Republic (is
it the Fourth or the Fifth incarnation? At least the
Europeans have the good grace to tack on those
numbers) is primarily a provider of domestic
services with a sideline in international relations.
This is a striking contrast from the older American
Republic where the government provided domestic
defense and not much else.
It's simplest to think of a thing in terms of its
function. With the majority of Federal spending
going to Social Security and Medicare, our
government is essentially an insurance company that
takes a percentage of salaries and "invests" that
money into a social safety net. Except the money
isn't invested, it's squandered, and much of it goes
to people who are not paying into the system.
As insurance companies go, our government is
unreliable and untrustworthy, its payouts are poor,
its customer service is terrible and the people
running it would be in a jail cell if they were
running a corporation the way that they run the
country.
To understand what our government is, imagine a
wasteful non-profit obsessed with Third World
children, merged with some kind of domestic poverty
charity, merged with an insurance company, attached
to a bunch of umbrella trade and regulatory groups
for entire industries with a huge military arm that
exists to stabilize troubled regions for the
business community.
This Frankenstein America monster is what the
current Republic looks like and the people running
it insist that this unwieldy beast, its bulky body
and its deviant brain, are a massive step forward
into the future. Well Dr. Frankenstein thought the
same thing and whether it's the Tea Party or OWS,
there are no shortage of peasants with pitchforks
out there.
Our national government is an insurance company
attached to a bunch of national and international
trade and regulatory groups. It's a progressive mad
scientist's dream of a government that can do
anything.
But the monster performs its functions like
Frankenstein trying to take a flower from a girl's
hand. The flower gets crumpled and Frankenstein
stomps off to smash things.
It can't handle the insurance business, because it
can't control the temptation to spend all those
piles of cash coming in.
It can't pay out the money again, because it is
determined to spend giant chunks of it on social
services to people who did not pay into it.
And it can't deliver any services in an efficient
manner because its departments exist to employ
incompetents who are bound by the rules to be even
more incompetent than their actual inclinations, so
that the system will be forced to hire even more
incompetents on an annual basis.
As for national defense, forget about it.
The military is lent out on a pro bono basis to
humanitarian projects maintained by NATO, which like
an international buggy whip manufacturer exists with
no purpose and has instead decided to go into the
business of intervening to prevent genocides against
Muslims that aren't taking place while ignoring
genocides by Muslims that are.
The whole thing is rolled into the United Nations,
which is like one of those dot com companies that
were supposed to be the next big thing, but never
became the next big thing, but kept raking in piles
of money from investors while promising to one day
revolutionize absolutely everything.
Think of the United Nations as Myspace. It's
expensive, outdated and uses the same shade of blue.
It used to be big, then it became irrelevant, but it
still won't go away. The United Nations is also one
giant walking and flying conflict of interest with
countries using it to settle political scores with
each other.
Our corporation's domestic programs, like its
international ones, suffer from conflicts of
interest.
First, the corporation is far more beholden to its
suppliers of services than its consumers of
services. This is a significant problem because it
means that the cost of providing those services is
constantly becoming more expensive and the
corporation keeps nodding its head at the inflated
product and labor figures presented by its
suppliers.
Between the internal inefficiency and the
unwillingness of the corporation to hold the line
with its suppliers, the financials are impossible,
and the corporation is currently running an annual
trillion dollar deficit. It keeps raising its
compulsory prices, but there is no reason to think
that it can function within any conceivable budget
because its boards, its executives and its suppliers
just adjust their spending to match the available
funds and then go twenty or thirty percent higher.
More money doesn't mean better or even workable
government. It means the corporations and unions who
are on the inside will take more money home and next
year there will be an bigger deficit, because like a
dumb beast, the system will eat as much as you give
it. It will not stop, because there is no profit
motive for the individuals running things to stop.
They can only make money by spending money and they
don't have to make money to spend money because they
control the cash flow..
On paper, the corporation exists to provide services
to customers. In practice it exists to provide
wealth to its boards, its suppliers and its
employees. It is a non-profit, in the worst sense of
the word, because its finances are unsustainable, it
keeps going only by compulsively lying to everyone
it owes money to, promising debtors that they will
be repaid and customers that they will be served,
while its insiders stuff their pockets full of
stolen money.
This state of affairs is not unprecedented among
corporations. It's a familiar form of corruption
being practiced on a truly epic scale.
Conflict of interest is completely natural. It is
human nature for people to look after themselves and
their friends first. It is also completely natural
for a system to serve itself and to build its
governance mechanisms in such a way that everyone on
the inside gets paid and almost everyone on the
outside gets screwed. It's all natural, but so is
murdering your neighbor for his camels and his wife.
Governments are set up to restrain the sort of
natural abuses that flow out of human nature. The
American variety of it was an experiment that tossed
out a ridiculously corrupt system dependent on
access and birth, and replaced it with one that
depended as little on government as possible. It was
still corrupt from the first, because it was still
human, but it was much less corrupt than all the
other alternative systems to it because everyone had
limited veto power over it and unlimited immunity
from it in many areas.
Since then we have gone from a system that limited
its own power to a system whose ideologues cry for
unlimited power and spin us the wonders of universal
college education and green energy that they will
produce for us if only we let them do whatever the
hell they want. But at least it's not one of those
horrible big corporations. Then we might actually
have a choice whether to do business with it or not.