Mohammed was a Pig
By Daniel Greenfield
SultanKnish.Blogspot.com
Israeli police arrested a fourth person for
calling Mohammed a pig. Avia Morris, the first
person arrested
described being taunted with cries of “Allahu
Akbar” and “Kill the Jews”
along with signs of support for ISIS. But it
only became a legal matter when the twenty-year-old
woman retorted, “Mohammed is a pig.”
Calling
for the death of infidels isn’t a crime. Insulting
Mohammed is.
Avia got off lucky. When a young woman named
Tatiana Soskin drew Mohammed as a pig scrawling
in a Koran, the
Clinton administration was more outraged by this
than by the World Trade Center bombing.
Its spokesman said that it gave “great thought to
this… at the very highest levels of our government.”
It denounced the “outrageous, crude and sick
portrayal of the Prophet Mohammed” and claimed,
“This woman is either sick or she is evil… she
deserves to be put on trial for these outrageous
attacks on Islam.”
That rant didn’t come from some storefront Mullah or
Bin Laden clutching his assault rifle in a cave on
an Al Jazeera video. It came from the twisted mind
of a sick and evil appeasement administration.
Sick and evil might have been a better description
of Mohammed’s practice of sex slavery than of a
young woman who drew a cartoon of a rapist as a pig.
When the Caliph of the Islamic State was revealed to
have taken American hostage Kayla Mueller as his
slave, he was following the law of Mohammed.
As ISIS put it, "Enslaving the families of the
kuffar (non-Muslims) and taking their women as
concubines is a firmly established aspect of the
Shariah (Islamic law) that if one were to deny or
mock, he would be denying or mocking the verses of
the Koran and the narrations of the Prophet.”
Was Mohammed a pig? He raped a little girl, forced
his son to divorce his slave wife so he could have
her, and took a number of captured non-Muslim women
as slaves the same way the ISIS Caliph did. Their
numbers included a number of captured Jewish women,
Safiyah and Rayhana, as well as Arab women such as
Juwayriyah. Rape and sexual slavery was a way of
life for Mohammed and his men.
By any civilized standard, Mohammed was a pig and
worse. And yet instead of calling out those who
praise a rapist and a pedophile, we lock up the
young women who dare call out his piggishness.
There is no reason to be surprised that these
piggish habits should also be a way of life for his
followers.
As we consider the fate of Kayla Mueller or of the
thousands of girls groomed to be sex slaves to
Muslim men in the UK, we must conclude that what
happened to them took place because our societies
have failed to tell the truth about Mohammed.
The
response to Muslim violence has been greater
extremes of censorship. There is a direct connection
between the amount of protective censorship imposed
on any criticism of Islam and Islamic violence. The
Clinton administration rant about Tatiana’s cartoon
took place after the World Trade Center bombing. And
yet it would have been unthinkable then to lock up a
Mohammed filmmaker, as Hillary and Obama did after
the Benghazi massacre. Each new atrocity creates new
momentum for censorship.
The Israeli police behave the way they do because
the authorities are desperate to keep some kind of
peace and it is always easier to censor, arrest and
control non-Muslims than Muslims. That is also why
the authorities in European countries are far more
willing to lock up those who burn the Koran or
criticize Islam than the Salafis who patrol the
streets as Sharia police and call for a Caliphate.
This is not tolerance. It’s appeasement. It’s
cowardice and treason.
We are in a race between collapsing systems
struggling to prop up an impossible situation
despite the outbursts of violence and those who tell
the truth about them. The worse the situation
becomes, the more the systems will try to retain
control through censorship. Unable to control the
followers of Mohammed, they will instead seek to
control those who tell the truth about him.
Telling the truth will become more dangerous, but it
will also save lives.
If Kayla Mueller had known the truth about Mohammed,
she might never have gone to Syria. If more mothers
and fathers in the UK had known the truth about
Mohammed, they might have been better able to
protect their daughters. If more people in America
and Europe knew about Mohammed, they might demand
that their governments let fewer migrants in who
believe Mohammed is a role model.
What is happening in the Islamic State is only a
more open version of what is already taking place in
the West. Slavery has returned to America, not under
the Confederate flag, but under the Saudi flag. The
Muslim sex grooming in the UK does not come with its
own flag, but with the Koran. And Muslims in this
country continue to try and bring non-Muslim women
out of this country to serve ISIS.
The Yazidi little girls enslaved by ISIS, just as
little girls in the UK were enslaved by Muslim
migrants, were told by their captors that raping
them was a prayer to Allah.
“According
to Islam he is allowed to rape an unbeliever,” a
twelve-year-old girl was told. “He said that by
raping me, he is drawing closer to Allah.”
As Islam spreads across the West, we are all drawing
closer to Allah. Portions of cities go dark and
become no-go zones. Terrible things happen there
that no one talks about. It’s important to talk
about them. But it’s also important to talk about
what ties together the little girls in the Islamic
State and the United Kingdom, the slave trade of
over a thousand years and Mohammed’s wives.
And that is Mohammed. Mohammed was a pig. We can and
should say it. As many times as it takes. He is not
a role model. He is not a prophet. It’s not the
women who call him a pig who are sick and evil.
It’s those who imitate and defend his sick and evil
ways.
Telling the truth about Mohammed is more than a
statement. It’s not a mere provocation. It saves
lives.