His Queeg Moment
By
HAL G.P. COLEBATCH
Spectator.org
A perspective on our president from Down Under.
In
Herman Wouk’s classic World War II novel, The
Caine Mutiny, there is a moment when a group of
the ship’s officers are getting away from the
increasingly eccentric Captain Queeq by relaxing
ashore.
Suddenly the malcontent Lieutenant Keefer asks the
others: “Does it occur to you that Captain Queeg may
be insane?
In fact Queeg is not insane, at least not at that
time. He is simply grappling, more and more
disastrously, with a job too big for him. Come
the crisis of a typhoon, he becomes paralyzed and
nearly sinks the ship by failing to give the obvious
orders. At the subsequent court-martial he appears
quite normal until he breaks down under the pressure
of cross-examination. Before this, the officers have
searched the regulations for guidance, but the
regulations refer only to a captain who is clearly
and unmistakably insane, not one who is merely
guilty of eccentricity and bad judgment. At a lower
level of responsibility, Queeg might have performed
adequately, but with Keefer’s question, the
remaining respect for Queeg’s office has gone.
Obama’s second inauguration speech may be his Queeg
moment — an undeniable demonstration that, in an
emergency, he is incapable of grappling with reality.
For all his unceasing invocation of the word
“change,” the outstanding thing about Obama has been
his apparent inability to react, even to an imminent
crisis. Like Queeg, he stands frozen on the bridge
as the waves grow higher, or obsesses over issues
like homosexuals and women in the military as the
typhoon rises..
Faced with the worst looming fiscal cliff-fall in
world history Obama, like Queeg in the typhoon, has
done nothing at all, but has, increasingly, resorted
to meaningless words. His pseudo-Keynesian fiscal
notions and a mantra-like repetition of old and
failed ideas, suggest a serious lack of mental
versatility.
Economics is not an exact science, but some of its
rules are now well-known, and one is that a
government cannot spend its way out of a recession.
Yet Obama does not project any sense of urgency,
merely a smug, radiating sense of his own greatness.
The one fiscal measure to which he seems committed —
taxing the rich — is infantile stuff, like Queeg’s
obsession with who ate the wardroom strawberries.
Any first-year politics or economics student knows
that there are not enough rich, even in as wealthy a
country as the United States, to have raising their
taxes make any appreciable difference. President
Reagan’s application of the Laffer Curve proved
emphatically, and only a short while ago, that the
way to both stimulate the economy and to increase
government revenues is to lower taxes. And it is not
hard to pick some areas at least where towering
taxes would make no appreciable difference to public
infrastructure.
Like Queeg, Obama shows an inability to change
course when such a change is desperately needed.
Giving 20 F-16 fighters and hundreds of tanks to
Egypt was never, in my opinion, a clever idea. Even
when Egypt was an unequivocal friend its security
required things like armored cars to put down street
violence, not these hi-tech weapons whose only
conceivable use would be against Israel. Indeed,
Obama seems to show no awareness that Egypt and
other major Islamic countries have changed from
being friends to something like enemies in a few
months. For a President of the United States there
is a difference between making a bad policy choice
and clinging to that policy when it is plainly
completely wrong, like the Caine steaming in a
circle and cutting its own tow-line. Mistakes that
cannot be ignored are always someone else’s fault
(refer George Bush).
The dancing is still there, the golf, the celebs,
the multi-million dollar holidays, but behind them
it is possible to detect a desperate emptiness, a
interconnected mosaic of failure. The one
much-boasted triumph, the killing of Osama Bin
Laden, was the work of other men. One of those most
responsible, Dr. Shakil Afridi, rots in the hellhole
of a Pakistani jail, abandoned. Obama’s oath to
bring the Benghazi murderers to justice seems to
have been forgotten as soon as it was made,
something — I am not sure if there is a word for it
— actually below the level of a campaign promise.
Allies have been lost or slighted in almost every
part of the world, the Afghan war has brought the
U..S and NATO humiliation and Russia and China lead
in Space. The defenses of the U.S.’s major
allies, such as Britain, are in an even more dire
situation.
This does not even consider the exploding levels of
domestic poverty. Restoring flexibility to the wage
system, so as to give American industry a reasonable
degree of competitiveness, seems out of the
question.
The Western position in Mali seems to have suddenly
collapsed without warning, or without preventative
action being taken, and meanwhile, we have had the
North Korean threat. I somehow doubt we would have
had that if Reagan had been at the helm.. What,
exactly have things come to when a cockroach of a
country, apparently run by real, certifiable
lunatics, can threaten the United States with
nuclear weapons? The typhoon waves are starting to
break over the bridge.