Doesn't Hillary Clinton Know the Law?
She says she didn't make security decisions on
Benghazi. But that's the secretary of state's job.
By Victoria
Toensing
WSJ.com
In
her interview with
ABC's
Diane Sawyer last week,
Hillary Clinton said "I was not making
security decisions" about Benghazi, claiming "it
would be a mistake" for "a secretary of state"
to "go through all 270 posts" and "decide what
should be done." And at a January 2013 Senate
hearing, Mrs. Clinton said that security
requests "did not come to me. I did not approve
them. I did not deny them."
Does the former
secretary of state not know the law? By statute,
she was required to make specific security
decisions for defenseless consulates like
Benghazi, and was not permitted to delegate them
to anyone else.
The Secure Embassy
Construction and Counterterrorism Act of 1999,
or Secca, was passed in response to the
near-simultaneous bombings of U.S. embassies in
Nairobi, Kenya, and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, on
Aug. 7, 1998. Over 220 people were killed,
including 12 Americans. Thousands were injured.
Bill Clinton was president. Patrick Kennedy, now
the undersecretary of state for management, was
then acting assistant secretary of state for
diplomatic security.
Susan Rice, now the national security
adviser, was then assistant secretary of state
for African affairs.
As with the Benghazi
terrorist attacks, an Accountability Review
Board was convened for each bombing. Their
reports, in January 1999, called attention to
"two interconnected issues: 1) the inadequacy of
resources to provide security against terrorist
attacks, and 2) the relative low priority
accorded security concerns throughout the U.S.
government."
Just as U.S. Ambassador
Chris Stevens did in 2012, the U.S. ambassador
to Kenya, Prudence Bushnell, had made repeated
requests for security upgrades in 1997 and 1998.
All were denied.
Because the embassies in
Kenya and Tanzania had been existing office
structures, neither met the State Department's
security standard for a minimum 100 foot setback
zone. A "general exception" was made. The two
review boards faulted the fact that "no one
person or office is accountable for decisions on
security policies, procedures and resources."
To ensure accountability
in the future, the review boards recommended
"[f]irst and foremost, the Secretary . . .
should take a personal and active role in
carrying out the responsibility of ensuring the
security of U.S. diplomatic personnel abroad"
and "should personally review the security
situation of embassy chanceries and other
official premises." And for new embassy
buildings abroad, "all U.S. government agencies,
with rare exceptions, should be located in the
same compound."
Congress quickly agreed
and passed Secca, a law implementing these (and
other) recommendations. It mandated that the
secretary of state make a personal security
waiver under two circumstances: when the
facility could not house all the personnel in
one place and when there was not a 100-foot
setback. The law also required that the
secretary "may not delegate" the waiver
decision.
Benghazi did not house
all U.S. personnel in one building. There was
the consulate and an annex, one of the two
situations requiring a non-delegable security
waiver by the secretary of state.
In October 2012 the Benghazi Accountability
Review Board convened, co-chaired by Amb. Thomas
Pickering (Ms. Rice's supervisor in 1998) and
Adm. Michael Mullen. It failed even to question
Mrs. Clinton for its report about the attacks.
It also obfuscated the issue of her personal
responsibility for key security decisions by
using a word other than "waiver," the passive
voice, and no names. Recognizing that the
Benghazi consulate (like the Nairobi and Dar es
Salaam embassies) was a previously
nongovernmental building, the Benghazi review
board reported that this "resulted in the
Special Mission compound being
excepted
[my emphasis] from office facility standards and
accountability under" Secca. No Hillary
fingerprints revealed there.
Mrs. Clinton either personally
waived these security provisions as required by
law or she violated the law by delegating the
waiver to someone else. If it was the latter,
she shirked the responsibility she now
disclaims: to be personally knowledgeable about
and responsible for the security in a consulate
as vulnerable as Benghazi.
Ms. Toensing was chief counsel for the Senate Intelligence Committee and deputy assistant attorney general in the Reagan administration.