Did Federal Agency Commit Climate Fraud? Sure Looks Like It
IBDEditorials.com
Junk Science: Worried about climate fraud,
Congress is investigating a federal agency for
allegedly manipulating weather data to show recent
global warming when there is none. So why is the
agency refusing to cooperate?
First, a little background: Satellite temperature
readings clearly show no warming trend for the last
18 years, 8 months and counting. None.
This fact is significant for two reasons: One,
satellite temperature readings are the most
comprehensive and thus the most accurate. And, two,
the pause in warming since 1998 undercuts the entire
global warming agenda of the environmental movement
and its allies on the left who see in climate change
an opportunity to impose greater government control
over our lives.
Yes, we're skeptical of "climate change," at least
as defined by the green extremists. Climate is
always changing. No one denies that. What's at issue
is how it's changing and why. The science is still
unclear.
Earlier this year, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) scientists took part in a
study that found — no surprise — that the "pause" in
global warming from 1998 to 2013 didn't exist.
Their change didn't come from actual temperature
readings. It came from extensive data manipulation
and tinkering. Instead of a pause, they found a
surge.
What's strange is that major temperature revisions
by NOAA and others in recent years have always been
up — never down — a clear sign of possible bias.
Earlier this year, for instance, it was revealed
that nearly half of all supposed global warming in
recent NASA data came from the agency's own highly
suspicious statistical changes, not from actual
temperature readings.
Enter Rep. Lamar Smith, a Texas Republican and
chairman of the House Science Committee. Curious, he
subpoenaed NOAA for research documents
related to the study. NOAA refused to hand them
over. Smith's committee wants to know why.
"The American people have every right to be
suspicious when NOAA alters data to get the
politically correct results they want and then
refuses to reveal how those decisions were made,"
Smith said this week.
We agree. For too long, global warming proponents,
both inside and outside government, have tried to
halt debate over their extreme conclusions and data
manipulation, all in the name of "science." Looks
political to us.
Taxpayers pay for this research, which is being used
to justify massive new federal spending and
regulation. They deserve to know what NOAA and other
federal agencies are doing — and whether they're
being honest or serving an unspoken extreme
political agenda.