BREACH OF FAITH AND TRUST
By
Maj.
Gen. Jerry R. Curry (Ret'd)
CurryforAmerica.com
In
May, 2008, 1Lt. Michael
Behenna found himself in Afghanistan interrogating a
terrorist who had killed two of his soldiers.
Suddenly, the terrorist lunged for Lt.
Behenna’s
pistol. Fortunately Lt. Behenna’s
reflexes were faster than the terrorist’s and
he was able to fire a bullet into his chest and
head, killing him. By any measure it was good
shooting.
But
Lt. Behenna was charged by the Army with
premeditated murder and found guilty of doing what
he had been trained to do – kill terrorists. He was
sentenced to 15 years in prison. The seven men who
found him guilty are non-infantry officers. That
means their combat experience is limited and they
haven’t had to stare death in the face where the
fastest and most accurate shooter lives.
There
is no such thing as being guilty of the premeditated
murder of an Islamic terrorist. The deaths of all
terrorists merit premeditation. And Lt. Behenna
merits a presidential pardon, but that won’t happen.
Writing in his memoire, former Secretary of Defense
Robert Gates says that President Obama is
distrustful of America’s military officers so he
would have no reason to believe that Lt. Behenna
acted appropriately.
Similarly, Lt. Col. Matthew Dooley, a highly
decorated combat commander, was reassigned from
Afghanistan back to the US to teach a course
entitled “Perspectives on Islam and Islamic
Radicalism” at the US Joint Forces Staff college.
The curriculum Lt. Col. Dooley was assigned to teach
was approved many years ago, but for some reason did
not come to the attention of Muslim special interest
groups until Lt. Col. Dooley arrived. Fifty-Seven
Muslim organizations signed a letter to the
Department of Defense demanding that training
materials offensive to them be purged and
instructors disciplined.
Eventually the letter was passed to General Martin
E. Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
This was shortly followed by a Defense Department
press release condemning the course material being
taught as not “simply objectionable” but
“inflammable.” Later on General Dempsey would say
that the course’s content was “totally
objectionable” and “against our values.” Lt. Col.
Dooley was releaved of his teaching assignment and
his exemplary career effectively trashed.
Most
surprising is that no one is speaking up for Lt.
Behenna and Lt. Col. Dooley. It is not easy but
Admirals and Generals need to find a way to Satisfy
their civilian masters in the Department of Defense
while at the same time standing up for and speaking
up for the troops they lead. This is particularly
true today when our Armed Forces are being gutted,
hollowed out, and grossly misused.
Each
soldier, sailor, airman and marine needs to know,
down to last one, that the President and his
Secretary of State will not cavalierly send them off
to fight and die on some irrelevant foreign
battlefield for some abstract political cause that
neither the President nor the nation believes in.
And once on a foreign battlefield, the military’s
rules of engagement should favor saving the lives of
America’s Armed Forces, not Al-Qaeda.
Our
troops should be free to do whatever is necessary to
defend their own lives, to blow away any terrorist
who even looks like he is about to fire on our
troops or allies. If a mistake is made and an
innocent is killed, restitution should be made as
best as is possible. But there should be no second
guessing of our soldiers’ actions.
Our
senior generals and admirals would do well to
remember the words of German Lutheran pastor Martin
Niemoeller who, when speaking of the NAZIs once
said, “First they came for the Communists, but I was
not a Communist so I did not speak out … Then they
came for the Jews, but I was not a Jew so I did not
speak out. And when they came for me, there was no
one left to speak out for me.”
No
nation can survive for long if there is a breach of
faith and trust between its President and its Armed
Forces. Most disturbing of all is the trend in
today’s military to throw under the bus officers
that are brave enough to stand up and tell it like
it is or to make decisions which they know are right
but of which the headquarters staffs might not
approve.