A Tribal War in Boston
By Daniel Greenfield
SultanKnish.Blogspot.com
Terrorism, like urban crime, is one of those
things that you're not supposed to think about too
much. It's fine to talk about your emotions after a
bombing or a mugging. You can even share stories and
eventually learn to laugh about it. What you cannot
do is talk about where it comes from except in the
vaguest terms of social conditions. Like pollution
from industry or corruption from government, it's
one of those toxic spinoffs of our modern society.
It's just there and we don't much talk about it.
Islamic terrorism is considered a social problem
in Europe. Ask an expert and they'll talk your ear
off about unemployment, racism, overcrowded housing
and the same long list of reasons used to explain
urban crime. The United States is slowly coming
around to that same point of view.
Forget the great debate between whether people kill
people or guns kill people. The conclusion reached
by most governments before your grandfather was born
is that social conditions kill people.
The Tsarneav brothers are being talked about in the
same way that most serial killers are. "They were so
nice. What made them do it?" It's the empty
repetition of a question to which no one really
wants to hear the answer. "What could have made them
do it?" isn't a genuine question, it's a ceremonial
washing of the hands. A ritualistic statement that
we couldn't have known anything was wrong. How could
we? They were so nice.
Tamerlan Tsarneav slapped around one girlfriend,
dragged another into a barefoot, pregnant and veiled
arrangement, and went around telling everyone they
were infidels. Sure he might have settled down at
some point, picked up his membership card in the
requisite front groups for the Muslim Brotherhood
and limited his terrorist activities to donating to
Islamic charities that just happen to do business in
the middle of war zones. He could have stuck to
beating his wife in the privacy of his home and told
his neighbors that America would one day be
destroyed knowing they would only nod and walk away
humming, "But he's so nice".
The United States is full of moderate Muslims just
like that. They are the people politicians point to
as proof that not all Muslims are terrorists, just
the ones who actually blow up things.
Tamerlan Tsarneav was indeed a social problem, but
not the one most liberals think he is. He wasn't
unemployment, racism or lack of parking spaces. He
was the social problem we don't talk about because
it's off limits. The empty space in the narrative.
The one that terrorism comes from.
The Europeans would talk about integration. But what
was there for Tamerlan to integrate to? A coterie of
white academics looking to get jobs on climate
change commissions? A rainbow coalition of
minorities taking pride in victimization while
demanding their piece of the pie? And who was he?
American? What does being American mean? Chechen?
Who are they? They're Muslims. They're killers. When
being American got too hard, Tamerlan rolled the
dice and they came up Chechen. They came up Muslim.
And we all know the rest of the story.
Eurocrats worry endlessly about how many Tamerlans
in London, Paris and Oslo roll those dice only to
see them come up Pakistani, Algerian and Somali. But
they can't talk about what's wrong with that.
Back in the Tsarneav homeland, clans fight each
other to the death, wiping out entire families to
the last child. Here is a brief description of one
man's vendetta. "He wanted to kill off all the men
in the other family, and he devoted his life to that
goal. He would hide someplace where he thought one
of his enemies might pass by, staying there for
weeks at a time if necessary. In the end, he killed
about 20 people."
That should sound familiar to anyone who sat in
front of the television watching the aftermath of
the Boston bombings. And here's another. "The oral
tradition abounds in tales of feuds sparked by the
theft of a chicken culminating in the death of an
entire Teip." What is a Teip you might ask. A Teip
is a Chechen clan. Everyone has one in Chechnya
including foreigners. To have a place in the
society, you must have a Teip of your own.
Otherwise. "This man has neither a Teip nor a
Tukkhum."
Where was Tamerlan's Teip in America? Americans
don't talk about their Teips. Instead Tamerlan found
the same Teip that so many other Pakistanis,
Egyptians, Somalis and other Muslim immigrants find
when they live in a non-Muslim country. Tamerlan's
Teip, like Nidal Hasan's Teip, was Islam.
Tamerlan took possession of his Teip. And then he
began to kill on behalf of his Teip. You can call it
the Clash of Civilizations or a clash of clans. At
the Boston Marathon, the Tsarneav brothers began
killing the members of the Boston Teip or the
American Teip in defense of the honor of the Islamic
Teip. We can call this sort of thing terrorism, and
it is, but it's also something much more primitive
and much less calculated.
The Afghan soldiers murdering American soldiers
often do it unprompted and sometimes even without
any prior planning. They do it because in tribal
cultures honor is complicated and murder is casual.
Life is cheap, especially the lives of men without
teips.
Americans were under the impression that Tamerlan
was a member of Teip America. He wasn't. Teip
America is fine for some some natives, but it was
much too big for him. It had no shape or purpose.
Nothing for him to claim possession of and defend.
Teip America gave him everything for free and
wouldn't even let him fight to take it. Teip America
gave him the good life, but took away his honor.
But what does all this Teip talk have to do with the
modern world? It is an article of faith that any
number of people can come to this country and bring
their diverse Teips with them, and aside from some
picturesque native foods and unique post-colonial
grievances, they all become part of the tapestry of
Teip America.
Chechnya is a modern place now. Sure it has
warlords, kidnappings and Sharia punishments, but
who are we to judge them? And Tamerlan Tsarneav grew
up in the United States. What could the crazy
backward mores of his society, which we mustn't
judge, have anything to with his killing spree?
There are more relevant things that we could talk
about, like race, class and the availability of
parking spaces in Boston.
Even now the politicians begin trooping down to the
local mosque to press the flesh with the "moderates"
who are the last best hope for preventing another
marathon massacre. But what is an American mosque
really? Some are still mono-cultural, dominated by
Lebanese, Turkish or Bangladeshi immigrants. Many
however are more expansive. They are artificial
Teips based on religion, rather than nationality or
race. Their existence is innately Islamist.
The American mosque is an outpost of tribal
Islamism. It's an artificial community that primes
members of tribal cultures to identify with and
defend a religious Teip. That is the system that the
Saudis have invested a good deal of money into
building because it provides them with an endless
flow of cannon fodder.
We are not a melting pot or a beautiful tapestry of
diversity. What we are is often something more
prosaic. Clans. The clans may be broadly defined,
but they are still there and if you doubt it, then
go try an urban neighborhood that you are not meant
to walk. The clan structure is weak and the leaders
are often absent. Some clans are full of single
mothers and itinerant male warriors. Others are
traditionally patriarchal. Some clans form alliances
based on language, geography or religion.
That is multiculturalism. It is a clumsy alliance of
Teips pretending to represent all the Teips.
Multiculturalism, like most forms of liberal
consensus, shut out any contradictory realities. But
there are Teips here other than the coalition of
community groups united to demand more money for
social services centers. There are older Teips in
America that come from the desert and the mountains.
Teips that care nothing for building more LGBT youth
centers and a great deal about honor and territory.
Tamerlan found his Teip in Islam. So have many
Islamic terrorists and political Islamists. Their
Teip is not one that we talk about. It is the Teip
that is at war with all the other Teips. It is at
war with the basic idea of Multiteipism that the
entire broken system it is trying to topple over is
based on. And the story is the same in Europe. It is
the same in Canada. It is the same in Australia.
It is the same everywhere.
We can't talk about this of course because we are
modern people and we know that's not how things
work. We know that we are lucky to be living in a
society with such rich diversity. Our diversity is
our strength. The more divided we become, the
stronger we will be. And if occasionally bombs go
off or heads fly or planes crash into skyscrapers,
we will walk away muttering, "But he was so nice."