When tragedy strikes, the hysterics rule
By Wes Pruden
PrudenPolitics.com
"If
you can keep your head when all about you are losing
theirs . . . yours is the earth and everything
that's in it, and which is more, you'll be a man. .
. "
Well,
maybe. But Kipling is an old guy who has nothing to
say to us. Being a man is not even the proper 21st
century response to crisis. We’re all modern here,
so we must emulate frightened, hysterical old women
like Mayor Michael Bloomberg of New York City, who
thinks he knows how to silence the guns.
President Obama should ignore Congress and write out
an executive order tomorrow morning to make the
streets safe for everyone, including all the little
kitties. “The president,” Bloomberg says, “can
introduce legislation even if it doesn’t get
passed.”
Sen.
Dianne Feinstein of California promises to introduce
legislation to curb the power of “the gun lobby.”
Sen. Charles Schumer of New York gets in his usual
rail about guns and the nuts who own them. Mayor
Rahm Emanuel of Chicago, where people-shooting is
the municipal sport, says it’s time “the leadership
in Congress will have a vote of conscience.” Since
only gun hysterics have a conscience we can imagine
how Hizzoner expects that vote to go.
It’s
not just the politicians who are wetting their
pants. Someone should call 911 because the CNN
newsroom needs medical help. “For the past three
days,” cried one correspondent on air, “I have been
on the verge of tears every second and most of the
people here have been crying 24 hour straight.” Ed
Schultz of MSNBC, where creepy crawlies have leapt
from Chris Matthews’ thigh to run up and down random
legs in the newsroom, thinks there’s no time for due
process: “It’s the confiscation of these types of
weapons that counts and will have an impact.” Bob
Schieffer of CBS News is relieved that the
Connecticut shooter is a good Judeo-Christian
American: “If this person had had, I’m sorry to say
this, but if he had had an Arab name people would be
going nuts about what we ought to do right now.”
What an odd thing to say. People with Arab names
have done evil things sometimes – the Fort Hood
massacre comes to mind – and there’s no record of
anybody going nuts over it. But it sounds like the
right thing to say.
Hysteria and frenzy are clearly the way the
politicians and media elites think we should deal
with tragedy. These media worthies might better
spend their tears and lamentations over the reckless
coverage of the tragedy, when speculation,
supposition and make-believe were presented as fact.
Errors included the wrong number of the dead, the
false identification of the shooter, the wrong guns
identified, and the way the shooter was dressed.
Tragedy was compounded by media ghouls who descended
on surviving children and parents, stuffing
microphones the size of beer cans in their faces to
ask, “how did it feel?” Alas, editors have been
chased out of the media.
Only
reluctantly, some questions are raised now about
whether such shooters are usually crazy, and what to
do about them. A recent survey by Mother Jones
magazine found that 38 of the 61 shooters in
massacres over the past three decade “displayed
signs of mental health problems prior to the
killings.”
Prof.
William Jacobson of the Cornell University Law
School suggests that laws inspired by the ACLU make
it difficult to identify and intervene with known
nuts. “Will we address mental-health and
educational-privacy laws, which instill fear of
legal liability for reporting potentially violent
mentally ill people to law enforcement? I doubt it.”
No
one wants to talk about the tawdry and violent pop
culture that has become a tsunami of blood and gore.
An entire generation has been poisoned by a steady
diet of television and movie shootings, knifings,
explosions and assorted trauma.
Cardinal Donald Wuerl, archbishop of Washington,
suggests we need to look into our hearts.
“What
is it in our culture, what is it in our society that
leads to this type of violence? Is it that we are so
focused on ourselves? Is it that we don’t regard the
dignity of every single person, the value of every
single life, as something precious? Have we created
such a mindset in our country that human life isn’t
considered any longer precious, sacred, something
we’re not allowed to take? We have to do some
soul-searching.”
Cardinal Donald Wuerl
Good
questions all, but there’s more media bang-bang with
guns.
Wesley Pruden is editor emeritus of The Washington
Times.