The romance of the
empty rhetoric
By Wesley Pruden
PrudenPolitics.com
Words, words, words. Stonewall Jackson famously told
soldiers to “make short speeches, and when you draw
the sword throw away the scabbard.”
Barack Obama is obsessed with words, and he never
learned to make a short speech, and he’s certainly
no Stonewall Jackson. The Israelis understand that,
however well-meaning he may be. The president may
even believe most of the stuff he hears himself say.
Mr. Obama made another pretty speech to the American
Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC, on Sunday
that was thrilling only to those who gorge on the
romance of rhetoric. Mr. Obama and his teleprompter
put on a show of bluffery that was surely the envy
of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. “Iran’s leaders should
know,” the president said, “that I do not have a
policy of containment. I have a policy to prevent
Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. And as I’ve
made clear time and again during the course of my
presidency, I will not hesitate to use force when it
is necessary to defend the United States and its
interests.”
Mr. Netanyahu said his responsibility to his country
is “to ensure that Israel remains the master of its
fate.”
Almost any Iranian truck driver could guide a Mack
truck through the loopholes with no fear of
scratching the paint. The president won’t hesitate
when it’s “necessary” to defend the United States
and its “interests.” The president, of course, will
decide when it’s “necessary,” and he gets to
determine what those “interests” may be. It may be
“necessary” to reassure the Islamic world by doing
nothing beyond making still another speech. The
“interests” of the United States, as Mr. Obama might
define them, could only be defended by another bow
from the presidential waist.
Benjamin Netanyahu, the visiting Israeli prime
minister who is accustomed to tense visits to
friends in Washington, reminded Mr. Obama the next
day that despite the president’s scolding about
“loose talk of war” his own responsibility to his
country is “to ensure that Israel remains the master
of its fate.” He could have reminded the president
of the reply of Charles Cotesworth Pinckney to
French demands for tribute and other bribes for
“offensive” remarks by President John Adams to
Tallyrand: “Millions for defense, sir, but not one
cent for tribute.” Such plain speech has gone out of
style in Washington, when and where it is needed
most. But not in Jerusalem, where the threat of
hanging naturally focuses the mind, as Dr. Johnson
said.
Mr. Obama, with his high regard for his reputation
as a man with singular gifts of pretty speech, no
doubt imagines he has discharged his obligations to
an ally with words (and a few notes of the music).
If he were a true student of the Muslim mind,
instead of being merely an admirer of the cultural
gifts of Islam (such as they are), he would
understand that the hard men in Tehran hear his
rhetoric not as kindly sentiment but as evidence of
weakness and flaccid impotence. That’s why they so
eagerly get on with the pursuit of the weapons
needed to “wipe Israel off the map.” The Islamic
despots understand a thing or two about empty
rhetoric.
Nobody wants war, which is always bad for all living
things. The Israelis understand that a nuclear
weapon in evil hands will be bad for Israel most of
all. “I have said that when it comes to preventing
Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon,” Mr. Obama
told AIPAC, “I will take no options off the table,
and I mean what I say.” This echoes his declaration
earlier to an interviewer that he doesn’t bluff.
Alas, a man who doesn’t bluff never has to say so;
if he makes such a boast, it’s usually a giveaway
that he’s bluffing. When Richard Nixon declared that
he was not a crook, everyone took that as
confirmation that he was. Some things are most
obvious when unspoken.
Through word and lack of deed, Mr. Obama leaves the
inevitable impression that he regards the standoff
between Iran and Israel in terms of moral
equivalence, not as the harsh reality that it’s
Iran’s boast, that it will destroy the Jewish state
while it builds the weapons that could do it, that
is the source of fear and loathing in the Middle
East. It’s Mr. Obama’s insistence that he prefers
diplomacy that reassures the mullahs in Tehran, that
he is counting on his eloquent bluster, boasting and
bombast as the weapons that will make the Iranians
and their like-minded friends repent and behave
themselves. The president’s rhetoric only persuades
them that he wears an empty scabbard.
Wesley Pruden is editor emeritus of The Washington
Times.