The New Terrorists - They're All of Us
By Wesley Pruden
PrudenPolitics.com
Barack Obama, the Chicago messiah who promised to unite a fragmented nation, is succeeding beyond his dreams, and maybe even the dreams of his father, which he wrote about so eloquently in his campaign autobiography.
We’re
all terrorists now.
The
Department of Homeland Security, ever on the scout
for opportunities to blow taxpayer money,
commissioned one of those “studies” so popular among
college professors, to find clues that would
identify prospective terrorists before they blow up
airplanes, bring down skyscrapers and otherwise
wreak havoc.
The
“new studies" show that just about everybody must be
dreaming of terrorism, plotting mayhem and chaos and
teaching others how to do it.
Something called the National Consortium for the
Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism
(learned professors dream of being paid by the word)
went to work at the University of Maryland and
produced a $12 million magnum opus called “Hot Spots
of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the United States,
1970-2008.” And not a moment too soon.
Islamic terrorism, the scourge of the civilized
world, like bubonic plague in an earlier time,
largely gets a pass; the study does not even mention
the first attempt to bring down the World Trade
Center in 1993 in the name of Allah. But the
professors have got the number of the rest of us.
The
NCSTRT, to use the popular acronym for the
consortium, took definitions from a study it did
last year called “Profiles of Perpetrators of
Terrorism.” (Professors never tire of quoting
themselves.) You might never guess who the perps who
populate professorial dreams might be. These are
some of the characteristics the feds at the
Department of Homeland Security can use to identify
terrorists: anyone who thinks his “way of life” is
under attack, anyone “fiercely nationalistic,”
“anti-global” or “suspicious of centralized federal
authority,” or “reverent of individual liberty.”
These
categories include, at one time or another, nearly
all of us – liberals who continue to rail at how
George W. Bush intended to do wicked things to
dissenters, and conservatives who are saying similar
things now about Barack Obama. Railing, some of it
on target and some of it not, is what Americans do.
Robust speech frightens the Department of Homeland
Security and its minions, who are not, after all,
necessarily steeped in the history, traditions and
habits of the republic.
Some
of this has made it into the mainstream press, so
called, but much of it hasn’t, and the task of
reporting it has often been left to Internet sites
like prisonplanet.com and infowars.com that monitor
the fine print of government regulations and
handouts. “The most flagrant example,” reports
prisonplanet.com, “was the infamous 2009 report
published by the Missouri Information Analysis
Center and first revealed by Infowars, which framed
Ron Paul supporters, libertarians, people who
display bumperstickers, people who own gold or even
people who fly a U.S. flag, as potential terrorists.
"The
rush to denounce legitimate political beliefs as
thought crimes, or even mundane behaviors, by
insinuating they are shared by terrorists, has
accelerated in recent months. Under the FBI’s
Communities Against Terrorism program, the bulk
purchase of food is labeled a potential indication
of terrorist activity.”
Who
could have guessed that Costco or Sam’s Club, where
everybody loads up hot dogs, pizza, sides of beef,
fruit, vegetables and toilet paper by the ton and
fruit juice and root beer in 60-gallon drums, are
hotbeds of terrorist scheming. One program, under
the aegis of the FBI, even calls using cash to pay
for a cup of coffee suspicious, even though most
coffee-shop cashiers frown on a customer paying for
a $1.50 cup of coffee with a credit card.
Junk
like this is of a piece with the continuing campaign
to cast conservatives as nuts. It’s nothing new,
there’s just more of it. A decade ago, a study by
professors at California at Berkeley, Stanford and
the University of Maryland, done for the National
Institute of Mental Health and the National Science
Foundation, concluded that “social conservatives”
suffer from “mental rigidity,” “dogmatism,” and
“uncertainty avoidance,” together with “associated
indicators of mental illness.” President Obama only
said it more succinctly and more colorfully, that
some Americans won’t vote for him because “they get
bitter, they cling to guns or religion.”
Photo by David Carlyon
We’re
all tempted sometimes to think those who disagree
with us are crazy, but now comes the federal
government to classify dissenters not merely nuts,
but terrorists. Such is the new civility the
president and his liberal friends commend to us.
Wesley Pruden is editor emeritus of The Washington
Times.