A number of years ago, I was the
victim
of a
brutal street crime. Although I was left with a
broken nose and two black eyes, I learned soon
thereafter that I wasn't a "good victim."
A progressive friend, Fran, clued me in.
When I told her what happened, she said,
"What you went through wasn't half as bad as
what he has suffered." Fran was referring
to the fact that I am white and the
assailant was black. In other words, my
suffering didn't matter.
Fran's reaction is not at all unique in
these parts; here, there are good and bad
victims. For instance, a couple of years
ago, a middle school teacher was stoned and
beaten in her classroom by a vicious mob of
students. And yet, because of the racial
makeup of the victim and the assailants, the
media had little to say, except to imply
that the teacher may have been a racist.
When I mentioned my horror about this
heinous crime to yet another leftist friend,
she responded in the prescribed, politically
correct way. Without showing an ounce of
compassion toward the battered teacher, my
friend blamed "white privilege."
With Obama and the hard left in charge, we
see nationwide what I've witnessed up close
and personal here in Berkeley. Thus, when a
young white couple were beaten unconscious
after leaving a GOP fundraiser, the
mainstream media did not find their plight
worthy of reportage. Similarly, when a
conservative had his finger bitten off, or
when a frail, diabetic conservative was
beaten, the silence was deafening. Sarah
Palin's church being torched with children
in it didn't deserve even a blip on the
evening news.
When thirteen U.S. soldiers at Fort Hood,
including a pregnant woman, were mowed down
(and thirty more wounded) in cold
blood, President Obama didn't interrupt a
Native American shout-out to renounce the
horror. When Obama finally did speak, he
urged us not to jump to conclusions. Since
then, next to nothing has been said about
the slaughter. The fact that the murderer
was a Muslim automatically disqualifies the
soldiers from being "good victims."
In contrast, during the recent, also
horrific Tucson massacre, twenty people were
injured and six killed by an apparently
psychotic 22-year-old. Given that the Fort
Hood murders involved an internal jihad,
doesn't this incident pose a greater safety
risk to this country than a lunatic in
Tucson? Consequently, shouldn't Fort Hood
have been dissected and analyzed for months
on end?
However, since the politicos found a way to
blame Tucson on conservatives, this latter
atrocity has garnered much more publicity.
In fact, Obama presided over a huge memorial
service for the families and survivors of
Tucson. No comparable event was held for
the loved ones of Fort Hood.
The left divides the world into good and bad
victims. People who are viewed as part of
an aggrieved group are "good victims."
Those who suffer at the hands of
these protected groups are not afforded this
same status. In fact, "bad victims," like
the middle school teacher, as well as me,
are made to feel responsible for being
assaulted. Good victims are showered with
attention because they reinforce the leftist
party line.
The left needs to control popular opinion by
censoring information that's unflattering to
its cause. If the populace were fully
informed about leftist violence, there would
be a mass stampede rightward. New Black
Panther leader
King Samir Shabazz
railing about murdering "crackers" and their
babies isn't exactly the best PR for the
progressives.
But there's an even more disturbing reason
why so many hardcore leftists divide the
world into good and bad victims. It is
because many of them don't care about human
beings.
Think I'm exaggerating? Then why haven't
progressives spoken out against the death
threats received by Sarah Palin and her
family? People on the left relish telling
Palin rape jokes -- or laughing at them.
Several leftists fantasized publicly about
conservatives dying painful deaths.
Comedian Wanda Sykes thought it would be a
hoot if Rush perished from a kidney disease.
And we're not talking here solely about
contempt towards conservatives. Many
progressives don't appear to be fans of the
human race. Euthanasia for the dying and
death panels for the old are discussed with
cold, steely indifference.
Former Clinton Labor Secretary
Robert Reich
tells elderly people that with
government-run health care, "We are going to
let you die." Editors at Newsweek Magazine
think nothing of splashing a cover feature
about "Killing Granny."
Obama himself doesn't seem to be a big
people-lover. He's buddies with unrepentant
terrorist Bill Ayers, who bombed living,
breathing humans. Obama appointed John
Holdren -- a man who has advocated forced
abortions and sterilizer in our drinking
water -- as science czar.
When Obama was an Illinois state senator, he
refused to protect live babies who survived
late-term abortion. While abortion is a
hot-button topic, who among us would not
agree that if the baby is born alive, he or
she should be allowed to remain in that
state?
Another disturbing example: progressives
have had a field day blogging about how
Palin should have aborted her Down Syndrome
child, Trig. Part of the reason Palin
resigned her governorship is because of the
vicious things said about Trig. Isn't it
offensive in the extreme when people wish
death by abortion on a fully formed child?
It makes me wonder: what has happened to
these people to make their hearts grow so
cold? Perhaps it's all the violent TV shows
and movies desensitizing people. Maybe it's
a result of the left's Alinsky-like tactics
that pit groups against each other for
limited resources.
More profoundly, in our secular
world, people are alienated from the life
force, from the Source of all love in the
universe. You can see it; the light has
gone out of so many people's eyes. And they
reveal this darkness by sexually degrading
Palin, wishing bodily harm on Rush, or
promoting the early deaths of our old
people.
For many progressives, their indifference,
even hatred, springs from a deep sense of
spiritual alienation. Because it is an
alienated person, a lost soul, who has
forgotten this essential truth: that every
life matters, even that of a Down Syndrome
baby or a political opponent.
A frequent American Thinker
contributor, Robin is a recovering liberal
and a psychotherapist in Berkeley. Robin's
articles are intended to inform and
entertain, not to offer treatment or
diagnosis. You can comment on this article
here.