Rewriting History to Elect a Dubious Future

 

By Gina Miller
DakotaVoice.com

In George Orwell’s iconic 1949 novel, Nineteen Eighty-Four, the ill-fated protagonist, Winston Smith, works for the so-called Ministry of Truth in which his job is to alter or re-write history as propaganda for the ruling party of Big Brother. Now, over sixty years later, we are seeing this very thing taking place in our own nation.

Over the weekend I received an email with a link to Leo Donofrio’s latest report. You may know that Mr. Donofrio is an attorney who has fought since 2008 to have Barack Obama (or whatever his name is) held accountable for proving his constitutional eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States. He challenges Obama’s eligibility on the grounds that if Obama’s father is who Obama claims, then his father was never an American citizen, so Obama was born with dual citizenship, thus Obama is ineligible to be President. So far Mr. Donofrio (and all others who have challenged Obama’s eligibility) has been shut out in every court.

Mr. Donofrio has discovered that in the run-up to the 2008 presidential election, references to a pertinent Supreme Court ruling which clearly defines “natural-born citizen” were scrubbed from 25 cases on the legal website Justia.com. The case is Minor v. Happersett from 1875, in which a Missouri woman, Virginia Minor, sued the registrar of voters, Mr. Happersett, for refusing to accept her registration to become a legal voter. He refused because she was not a male citizen of the United States.

A Missouri court sided with Mr. Happersett, and the Supreme Court agreed with the lower court’s ruling that the Constitution did not necessarily grant women the right to vote. However, in the high court’s unanimous opinion, the definition of “natural-born citizen” was clearly stated,

“The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”

That opinion of the United States Supreme Court plainly shows that Barack Obama is not constitutionally eligible to be President of the United States. He is illegally occupying our presidency.

Leo Donofrio’s latest report is stunning. He writes,

“New evidence conclusively establishes that 25 U.S. Supreme Court opinions were sabotaged then republished at Justia.com during the run up to the ’08 election. My prior report documented the scrubbing of just two cases. But last week, a third sabotaged case was discovered which led to a thorough examination of all US Supreme Court cases which cite ‘Minor v. Happersett’ as they appeared on Justia.com between 2006 and the present.

Since Justia placed affirmations on each tampered opinion which state ‘Full Text of Case’, personnel may also be guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. 1018 by intentionally passing off tampered versions of US Supreme Court opinions as if they were official versions published by the US Supreme Court.

At this point, we do not know who committed these acts of sabotage. Since neither Obama nor McCain meet the Supreme Court’s definition of a ‘natural-born citizen’ in Minor v. Happersett, the deception might have been undertaken on behalf of either one.

Regardless of who you supported in 2008, or whether you agree with the assertion of Minor’s relevance, every American should be outraged that 25 Supreme Court cases were surgically sabotaged and then passed off to the public as if the tampered versions contained the ‘Full Text of Case’. This is the very definition of ‘Orwellian’ fascism. It’s propaganda. And there is no place for it in the United States. The sacrifices for truth and justice which created and have sustained this nation are wantonly debased by the subversive deception emanating from Justia.com servers.

We do not know at this point if Justia personnel were behind this or if their site was hacked. That being said, Justia’s reaction to my last report mirrored the deception of the sabotage. Instead of addressing the proof, Justia quietly and with stealth un-scrubbed the evidence without acknowledging or addressing the issue at all. And they placed ‘.txt robots’ on their URL’s for the two previously identified cases so the Wayback Machine could no longer provide historical snapshots of those cases as published at Justia.”

This is simply beyond the pale. The way Mr. Donofrio discovered this possibly criminal activity requires a lengthy explanation which he provides in his report. I recommend you take some time to read his report which is linked above, but it is abundantly clear that someone made a great effort to prevent people from easily finding that very relevant Supreme Court ruling prior to the ’08 election.

Mr. Donofrio’s first report back in July informed us that he had discovered two altered cases, and within an hour of his posting the report on his website, the scrubbed information was restored to the Justia site. As he stated, Justia webmasters also added robot files to those web pages to prevent previous versions of the pages from being searched and seen on the Internet Archive website, called the Wayback Machine.

Yesterday morning, Mr. Donofrio added an update to his latest report, and it is apparent that Justia’s webmasters are going into hyper-damage-control mode, because they have added robots to their entire site so that older, cached versions of their pages cannot be searched on the Wayback Machine, and their sabotage of Supreme Court case text can no longer be found. However, Mr. Donofrio has saved the screen shots of the cached pages and has posted them on his website and released them to the media and the public. In his update, Mr. Donofrio also points out that Justia’s adding of robots to its entire site operates as an admission by Justia. He said a criminal investigation of this matter is required.

As Mr. Donofrio noted, since both Obama and John McCain are ineligible for the U.S. presidency according to the Minor v. Happersett ruling, either candidate may have benefited from the scrubbing of the Minor references from Justia. However, Mr. Donofrio reports that Justia’s CEO Tim Stanley was associated with Obama forAmericain 2008. However, as with all of the constitutionally-challenged behavior of this outlaw Obama administration, it is unlikely that the scrubbing and restoring of Minor v. Happersett citations will ever be tied to the Obama machine, just as it is unlikely Obama will be held accountable for his illegally occupying the United States presidency, but we can still hope it will happen.

Dianna Cotter at Examiner.com also did an excellent write-up of this despicable story. Among many good points, she states,

“In order to minimize the importance of Minor, someone at Justia deliberately decided to make these supporting citations as difficult as possible to find.

This has had the desired effect, diluting the importance of Minor v. Happersett in the national dialogue across the blogosphere’s political spectrum ever since. The end result: the one case which defines Natural Born Citizen was reduced to seeming irrelevance, and thus the conversation never got past doorkeepers already in Obama’s camp in the mainstream media.

Of course, a lawyer going into Court would never rely upon anything but an official source for Supreme Court law, but 99.9% of the population have no access to dusty law texts, or expensive legal research services such as Lexis and Westlaw. Those who committed these crimes were well aware of this, and used it to their advantage.”

It is almost inconceivable to imagine the lengths to which Obama’s handlers went to force him into the U.S. presidency. I am certain we will never know all of the dirty moves made to make certain he was installed in office. This scrubbing of Supreme Court citations is likely only the tip of the iceberg. We know that any of Obama’s past documents, from school records to passport records to pretty much any record that would tell us anything about who this man really is, have been sealed and hidden from any scrutiny. What does this America-destroying communist have to hide? Oh, pretty much everything, I imagine.

This JustiaGate, as Dianna Cotter dubbed the emerging scandal, is just getting started, and we will likely hear much more about this awful business in the coming days and weeks.

Near the end of Dianna Cotter’s piece, she notes,

“Minor v. Happersett defined the one specific term which Barack Obama could not overcome with ‘Hope and Change’ though he could ‘hope’ someone would ‘change’ the cases which help define the term ‘Natural Born Citizen,’. This case, if it had been sufficiently known to the public and media, and sufficiently documented by supporting citations, might have eliminated the possibility of Obama’s nomination and/or election. Either Obama got lucky in this regard, or the ‘constitutional law professor’ and former editor of the Harvard Law Review had some hand in directing the efforts to erase the very citations in law which define him as a citizen, and at the same time rule him out as a constitutional candidate for President of the United States.”

We will certainly be keeping an eye on this wretched story and further developments.

I keep hoping for a break, for something to stick to this America-hating, outlaw devil in the White House. I keep hoping and praying that one day this side of eternity he will be held accountable for his wicked, tyrannical actions since taking office. In the meantime, we can not possibly get him out of office fast enough.

Gina Miller, a native of Texas, is a radio commentator. She also works with her husband installing and repairing residential irrigation systems and doing landscaping on the Mississippi Gulf Coast.