| |
Enforcing immigration law would be a bargain
By
Byron York
Chief Political Correspondent
WashingtonExaminer.com
Even as the Obama administration plans to challenge and undermine Arizona's
new immigration law, the White House still wants state residents to know it
feels their pain. "It's really a cry of frustration from Arizona," Homeland
Security Secretary -- and former Arizona governor -- Janet Napolitano said
on ABC Sunday. "It's a frustration ultimately that will only be solved with
comprehensive immigration reform."
But for the majority of Arizonans, the source of frustration is not the
absence of comprehensive reform. It is the federal government's half-hearted
enforcement of the nation's immigration laws. And what is seldom discussed
in the current controversy is how little -- in relative terms -- better
enforcement would cost.
On April 19, the same day the Arizona Legislature passed the immigration
measure, the state's two Republican senators, John McCain and Jon Kyl,
unveiled a new plan to secure the U.S. border with Mexico. It's a
combination of completing and improving the border fence, adding new Border
Patrol agents, expanding a policy of briefly jailing illegal border
crossers, and several other programs already in existence. Although there is
not yet an estimate of how much it would cost, the price would be vastly
less than the sums going to bailouts, the stimulus, and the planned national
health care system.
"When you are talking about national security and laying the foundation for
comprehensive immigration reform, it's a relatively small investment," says
Kyl.
Start with the fence. The Secure Fence Act, passed by Congress in 2006,
specified 700 miles of the Southwest border to be secured with
double-layered, reinforced fencing and other physical barriers. The Customs
and Border Protection agency says 646 miles of fencing have been finished.
For them, the job is essentially done.
But it's not, and the situation in Arizona shows why. The state's border
with Mexico is 375 miles long. As it stands today, there are 123 miles of
pedestrian fence, that is, high fence meant to stop people from climbing
over. However, all but 10 miles of that is single-layered fence, which is
easier to cut and get through than a double-layered fence, especially one
with a road or other space between the barriers.
In addition, there are 182 miles of vehicle fencing -- bollards or steel
beams designed to stop smugglers in cars and trucks. But illegals can easily
climb over these, and sometimes smugglers can drive over them using their
own ramps.
The Kyl-McCain plan would require double- and even triple-layer fencing in
several areas of the border and beefed-up barriers in others. "According to
the Border Patrol, it would have a very significant positive effect," says
McCain. "Just as it has had a positive effect in San Diego and Texas."
How much would it cost? Given that much of the basic structure already
exists, perhaps $1 million per mile. Revamp the whole 700 miles and it's
$700 million.
Kyl and McCain would add 3,000 new Border Patrol agents. A
back-of-the-envelope cost estimate is about $100 million per 1,000 new
agents, so the plan would cost about $300 million. The proposal also calls
for hiring more U.S. marshals, clerks, and administrative staff, which would
mean more costs.
Then there is the jailing program, called Operation Streamline, which sends
all illegal crossers to jail for a period of 15 to 60 days. When it has been
tried selected areas, it has caused the illegal crossing rates to plummet.
"Very effective," says McCain. "A huge deterrent," says Kyl.
The senators are waiting for an estimate of how much a bigger an expanded
Operation Streamline would cost, but so far, the Obama administration has
not come up with a number.
There are other expenses. For example, McCain and Kyl want to send a few
thousand National Guard troops to the border. When this was done in 2007 and
2008, it cost a total of $1 billion.
There is little doubt such moves would work. In one part of the
Arizona-Mexico border where authorities installed double-layered fencing and
implemented Operation Streamline, the yearly number of illegal crossers went
from 118,000 to 8,000.
Total cost? It's hard to say, but it seems fair to guess that for a
relatively low price -- perhaps $5 billion? -- the nation could radically
increase the security of the Southwest border. The columnist George Will
recently called the cost of securing the border "a rounding error on the
[$50 billion] GM bailout." He's right.
As Kyl and McCain see it, Napolitano has things totally turned around.
Today's problem won't be solved by comprehensive immigration reform.
Instead, solving the problem would make comprehensive reform possible. And a
bargain, too.
Byron York, the
Examiner's
chief political correspondent, can be contacted at
byork@washingtonexaminer.com. His column appears on Tuesday and
Friday, and his stories and blog posts appears on www.ExaminerPolitics.com
ExaminerPolitics.com.