DEFINING THE FORCE AND MISSION
By Maj. Gen. Jerry
R. Curry (Ret'd)
CurryforAmerica.com
The fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya is
causing our civilian and military leaders to
review and reassess the involvement of
American military forces in insurgencies and
guerrilla warfare and more clearly determine what
should be the role of the United States -- the
shining city on the hill -- in such wars. This
causes the entire area of Defense spending and force
structure to be subjected to a top-to-bottom roles,
missions, budget and force structure review.
Talk around
There is nothing new or wrong in trying to do more
with less, but in war it is wise to let the facts be
the facts. They are not what senior officers in the
Pentagon, Congress and White House wish them to be;
they are what they are.
Defense Secretary Don Rumsfeld tried to get General
Eric Shinseki, Chief of Staff of the Army, to agree
that the
Success in combat depends on many things, including
the development of new weapons and weapons delivery
systems, and the money necessary to develop and
purchase them. It also depends on a clear definition
of the mission and strong, intelligent leadership at
all levels.
The
We presently have a President with zero military
experience and a Secretary of Defense with little
more. Do they possess the qualifications needed to
review the restructuring of our armed forces and
make the necessary decisions concerning the
development of new weapon’s technologies and
capabilities? Not hardly.
One day at
His lecture that day was on how to successfully
organize for, fight and win guerilla wars. During
the question-and-answer session, one of my
classmates – referring to President Kennedy’s recent
intervention in
“You don’t,” he replied. “You let them be enslaved.
If a people are unwilling to fight to secure freedom
and democracy for themselves, you have two options.
You can occupy them and take over their government
and armed forces, including promotion authority.
This assumes that you run their communication
systems, transportation and public schools.
“It’s not hit and run. If your nation is willing to
make such an extreme sacrifice and investment for
the next 20 or 30 years, perhaps you then can
successfully educate, train, motivate and raise up a
generation of young people who will embrace
democratic values and be willing to fight and die to
preserve them.
“But personally I think it’s a gamble. There is
little chance of success if you adopt that course of
action,” he shrugged and soothed down his silver
hair. “The other alternative is to write them off as
a free nation.”
Over the years, particularly during my two tours in
Vietnam, where my first tour was commanding the
220th Reconnaissance Airplane Company (L-19) in I
Corps and along the DMZ, and my second tour was as
an advisor to a South Vietnamese infantry regiment
operating in the jungles and highlands of II Corps,
I often thought back on his remarkable, frightening
observations.
At the time his comments seemed unduly harsh and
cynical. But later, in musing about the wars in
The roots of
Dying for another nation’s unappreciated notion of
freedom may very well be a whole different matter.