A Tale of Two Commencements
For Obama, politics is life. For Romney, politics does not define us.
By Daniel Henninger
WSJ.com
Two days after Mitt Romney delivered the
commencement speech at Liberty University, the big
evangelical Christian school founded by Jerry
Falwell, Barack Obama tutored graduates at Barnard
College, the intensely liberal all-women's school
adjacent to Columbia University. As you might guess,
the wisdom these two political elders imparted to
the Class of 2012 was not the same.
Of course the first purpose for both men was to turn young graduates into believers. Mr. Romney, a Mormon, needs to win over ambivalent evangelical voters. Mr. Obama, a liberal Democrat, expects to have the 22-year-old college graduate vote locked up—if they vote.
Yes, of course, they pandered.
Barack Obama, by now a master at faux
self-deflation, admitted he was pandering: "Now I
recognize that's a cheap applause line when you're
giving a commencement at Barnard." (Laughter.) He
had said the women of this generation will help lead
the way. (Applause.)
Mitt Romney solved his more problematic pandering
assignment by piling praise onto the university's
late founder, the Rev. Jerry Falwell—"a cheerful,
confident champion for Christ."
But even amid pandering one may find truths about
candidates revealed, and so it was in New York City
and Lynchburg, Va.
The world that Barack Obama conveyed to the women
at Barnard is totally, overwhelmingly political. To
be sure, there were references to parental joy at
the success of children completing college, but
virtually every thought in the Obama commencement
address—on the accomplishments of the past or a
graduate's goals—was defined by political activity.
He said they are about to grapple with unique
challenges, "like whether you'll be able to earn
equal pay for equal work" or "fully control
decisions about your own health."
The role of the citizen in "our democracy" began 225 years ago at the Convention in Philadelphia, which had "flaws," to wit: "Questions of race and gender were unresolved." Nonetheless, it "allowed for protest and movements."
And so: "Don't accept somebody else's
construction of the way things ought to be. It's up
to you to right wrongs. It's up to you to point out
injustice. It's up to you to hold the system
accountable and sometimes upend it entirely. It's up
to you to stand up and to be heard, to write and to
lobby, to march, to organize, to vote."
Mr. Obama described his own early job as a
community organizer: "I wanted to do my part to
shape a better world." He cited the accomplishments
of previous generations of young people who "stood
up and sat in from Seneca Falls to Selma to
Stonewall." This, Mr. Obama said, is how "we
achieved" women's rights, voting rights, workers'
rights and gay rights.
Barack Obama seems to inhabit a world of history
and personal experience in which good people at
every turn are held back by individuals or
oppressive forces that one only overcomes by
personal or public resistance.
Someone in high school told Labor Secretary Hilda Solis she wasn't college material. Mr. Obama's grandmother worked for a bank but hit the glass ceiling. And today there are "those who oppose change, those who benefit from an unjust status quo [and] have always bet on the public's cynicism or the public's complacency." He predicts they will lose "this time as well."
Fair enough. That's how the world works for
Barack Obama, though it strikes me he is telling
America's 22-year-olds that the road ahead is a
fairly grim proletarian struggle. Be ready to occupy
everything. Where's the joy in that?
There was less tooth and claw in the Romney
speech at Liberty University. In a discussion of the
uses of religious freedom, one passage in particular
separated Mr. Romney from Barack Obama's default to
mass action. "The great drama of Christianity," Gov.
Romney said, "is not a crowd shot, following the
movements of collectives or even nations. The drama
is always personal, individual, unfolding in one's
own life." Out of this, he said, "Men and women of
every faith, and good people with none at all,
sincerely strive to do right and lead a
purpose-driven life."
Progress, he argued, emerges through "conscience
in action," for him "the nation's greatest force for
good." Mr. Romney referred several times to the idea
of personal service. "The call to service," he said
"is one of the fundamental elements of our national
character. It has motivated every great movement of
conscience that this hopeful, fair-minded country of
ours has ever seen."
For Barack Obama, life is
politics. For Mitt Romney, life includes
politics; politics, he said, does not define us.
To wage a presidential campaign in our nonstop
media age, the man who sees politics as a battering
ram may have an edge. But Mitt Romney, with his
politics of optimism and personal conscience, could
be onto something that will serve him well.
Write to henninger@wsj.com