A gift of gaffe from the
chief
By Wesley Pruden
PrudenPolitics.com
Few voters choose a president for his views on
foreign policy, which is regarded as work best left
to credulous wonks, artless dips and naïve
double-domes. It’s work in a place where real people
don’t want to go.
Voters make occasional exceptions. George McGovern,
who promised to “crawl on my knees” to Hanoi to end
the Vietnam war, and Jimmy Carter, who bungled an
attempt to rescue the American hostages in Tehran
and left eight American soldiers dead in the desert,
paid for their reckless goofiness as soon as the
voters got a chance to bury them under landslides.
Barack Obama may soon join them in that pantheon to
the gods of presidential screw-ups. He sent a
message to Vladimir Putin begging for “space” with
an implied promise to trash American missile defense
later, after he achieves “flexibility” with the
November election. That sounds like a promise to
crawl on his knees to Moscow. Mr. Obama knows how to
crawl. He earlier crawled to Cairo to deliver an
apology for America being America, and offering
something that sounded like a promise to make the
Middle East safe for radical Islam.
“On all these issues, but particularly defense,” the
president said in the confidential assurance to be
relayed to Mr. Putin late last month in Seoul, “this
can be solved, but it’s important for him to give me
space. . . This is my last election. After my
election, I have more flexibility.”
Mr. Obama put his flacks and underlings in full
panic mode, to explain that he hadn’t said what he
said. He even tried to make a joke of it. Most
Americans, unsophisticated rubes and uneducated
rustics as we may seem to Mr. Obama’s wonks and wise
men, never laugh at the idea of short-changing the
land we love. The president would understand this if
he understood America.
When Mitt Romney pounced, demanding to know what
concessions the president has in mind after the
election for “our number one geopolitical foe,” the
president dispatched Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden
to sweep up the broken glass. Who better than
Hillary, who has more experience than anyone else
listening to presidents caught with their mikes open
(or their pants down). She told Mr. Romney to be
“more realistic” about the Russians. “I think it’s
somewhat dated to be looking backwards instead of
being realistic about where we agree, where we don’t
agree.”
This sounds like something she heard from Bubba, ‘splainin’
smaller and more colorful sins in the White House.
Good ol’ Joe Biden, roused from his nap in the
attic, reminded Mitt Romney and the Republicans that
the Cold War is over, that “this is not 1956. We
have disagreements with Russia, but they’re united
with us on Iran.”
If the Russians are our allies, we don’t need
adversaries. If Hillary and ol’ Joe are telling it
like they really think it is, we’ve got all the
short attention spans Washington can accommodate.
Down the memory hole go the Russian obstacles to
sanctions on Iran that would really bite, Russian
completion of the Iranian nuclear reactor at Bushehr,
shipment of Russian arms to Bashar Assad enabling
him to slaughter Syrians, and the determined
destruction of democracy within Russia.
Hillary, who not so long ago asked of the Russians,
“whose side are they on?,” knows better than to
believe most of the stuff she has to say. If a
diplomat is someone paid to tell lies for his
country, as the old diplomatic saying goes, a
secretary of state is paid to tell the president’s
whoppers.
The concession Vladimir Putin really wants – the
concession that President Obama thinks must wait
until after the November election – is the
dismantling of the nuclear missile shield. Ronald
Reagan offered the Russians participation in the
defensive shield decades ago, but got no taker.
Moscow wants a legally binding pledge, whatever that
could be, that the United States would never target
Russia. Moscow would share control of the American
shield.
This may be the concession that Barack Obama has in
mind for after the election. Nobody but the
president knows, and he only talks to the Russians
about it. He knows better than to tell us about it
now. Survival is foreign policy so simple that
rubes, rustics and even cave men can understand it.
This is the gift of gaffe that will keep on giving.
Wesley Pruden is editor emeritus of The
Washington Times.